China vs OECD: Swine — Losses from manure treated

China
343.25 million kg
in 2023
OECD
892.23 million kg
in 2023
China rank
2nd
OECD rank
1st

Swine — Losses from manure treated over time

  • China
  • OECD
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M1.0B196119922023

How they compare

OECD currently reports 892.23 million kg against 343.25 million kg in China, a difference of 548.97 million kg.

That makes OECD's figure about 2.6 times China's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, OECD has been ahead every year.

China ranks 2nd and OECD ranks 1st of 188 countries.

OECD has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China OECD Difference Ahead
1960s 112.84 million kg 637.88 million kg 525.05 million kg OECD
1970s 203.98 million kg 769.10 million kg 565.13 million kg OECD
1980s 251.62 million kg 855.96 million kg 604.34 million kg OECD
1990s 311.67 million kg 884.32 million kg 572.65 million kg OECD
2000s 340.12 million kg 907.27 million kg 567.14 million kg OECD
2010s 355.01 million kg 899.36 million kg 544.35 million kg OECD
2020s 344.51 million kg 913.73 million kg 569.21 million kg OECD

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — losses from manure treated, China or OECD?
OECD, at 892.23 million kg against 343.25 million kg in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — losses from manure treated between China and OECD?
548.97 million kg, with OECD ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and OECD?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and OECD rank globally for swine — losses from manure treated?
China ranks 2nd and OECD ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs OECD: Swine — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/china/oecd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/china/oecd/">China vs OECD: Swine — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).