Czechoslovakia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Swine — Losses from manure treated

Czechoslovakia
30.25 million kg
in 1992
United Republic of Tanzania
490,911 kg
in 2023
Czechoslovakia rank
15th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
14th

Swine — Losses from manure treated over time

  • Czechoslovakia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
010.0M20.0M30.0M196119922023

How they compare

Czechoslovakia currently reports 30.25 million kg against 490,911 kg in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 29.76 million kg.

That makes Czechoslovakia's figure about 61.6 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.

Czechoslovakia ranks 15th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 14th of 172 countries.

Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechoslovakia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 24.51 million kg 94,237 kg 24.42 million kg Czechoslovakia
1970s 27.59 million kg 124,704 kg 27.47 million kg Czechoslovakia
1980s 30.87 million kg 213,750 kg 30.66 million kg Czechoslovakia
1990s 30.99 million kg 300,429 kg 30.68 million kg Czechoslovakia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — losses from manure treated, Czechoslovakia or United Republic of Tanzania?
Czechoslovakia, at 30.25 million kg against 490,911 kg in United Republic of Tanzania as of 1992.
What is the difference in swine — losses from manure treated between Czechoslovakia and United Republic of Tanzania?
29.76 million kg, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and United Republic of Tanzania?
32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
How do Czechoslovakia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for swine — losses from manure treated?
Czechoslovakia ranks 15th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 14th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechoslovakia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Swine — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/czechoslovakia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/czechoslovakia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Czechoslovakia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Swine — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).