El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Swine — Losses from manure treated

El Salvador
323,965 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
333,758 kg
in 2023
El Salvador rank
100th
Zimbabwe rank
99th

Swine — Losses from manure treated over time

  • El Salvador
  • Zimbabwe
200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 333,758 kg against 323,965 kg in El Salvador, a difference of 9,793 kg.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 100th and Zimbabwe ranks 99th of 172 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 525,792 kg 129,344 kg 396,448 kg El Salvador
1970s 613,053 kg 179,982 kg 433,072 kg El Salvador
1980s 508,645 kg 184,580 kg 324,065 kg El Salvador
1990s 326,919 kg 246,040 kg 80,879 kg El Salvador
2000s 485,130 kg 227,805 kg 257,325 kg El Salvador
2010s 374,212 kg 280,339 kg 93,873 kg El Salvador
2020s 323,965 kg 292,747 kg 31,218 kg El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — losses from manure treated, El Salvador or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 333,758 kg against 323,965 kg in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — losses from manure treated between El Salvador and Zimbabwe?
9,793 kg, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Zimbabwe rank globally for swine — losses from manure treated?
El Salvador ranks 100th and Zimbabwe ranks 99th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Swine — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/el-salvador/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/el-salvador/zimbabwe/">El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Swine — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).