Eswatini vs Puerto Rico: Swine — Losses from manure treated

Eswatini
42,774 kg
in 2023
Puerto Rico
54,570 kg
in 2023
Eswatini rank
131st
Puerto Rico rank
129th

Swine — Losses from manure treated over time

  • Eswatini
  • Puerto Rico
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 54,570 kg against 42,774 kg in Eswatini, a difference of 11,796 kg.

That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 1.3 times Eswatini's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 131st and Puerto Rico ranks 129th of 172 countries.

Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1960s 9,115 kg 224,824 kg 215,709 kg Puerto Rico
1970s 14,960 kg 315,594 kg 300,635 kg Puerto Rico
1980s 16,153 kg 272,545 kg 256,392 kg Puerto Rico
1990s 27,284 kg 238,561 kg 211,277 kg Puerto Rico
2000s 31,357 kg 91,249 kg 59,893 kg Puerto Rico
2010s 34,959 kg 59,776 kg 24,817 kg Puerto Rico
2020s 43,683 kg 54,570 kg 10,887 kg Puerto Rico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — losses from manure treated, Eswatini or Puerto Rico?
Puerto Rico, at 54,570 kg against 42,774 kg in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — losses from manure treated between Eswatini and Puerto Rico?
11,796 kg, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Puerto Rico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Puerto Rico rank globally for swine — losses from manure treated?
Eswatini ranks 131st and Puerto Rico ranks 129th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Puerto Rico: Swine — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/eswatini/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/eswatini/puerto-rico-us/">Eswatini vs Puerto Rico: Swine — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).