New Caledonia vs Uruguay: Swine — Losses from manure treated

New Caledonia
177,469 kg
in 2023
Uruguay
200,909 kg
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
113th
Uruguay rank
112th

Swine — Losses from manure treated over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Uruguay
0200.0k400.0k600.0k196119922023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 200,909 kg against 177,469 kg in New Caledonia, a difference of 23,440 kg.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.

New Caledonia ranks 113th and Uruguay ranks 112th of 169 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 93,190 kg 518,445 kg 425,255 kg Uruguay
1970s 96,945 kg 519,042 kg 422,097 kg Uruguay
1980s 146,059 kg 316,982 kg 170,923 kg Uruguay
1990s 137,482 kg 356,515 kg 219,033 kg Uruguay
2000s 145,080 kg 327,757 kg 182,678 kg Uruguay
2010s 173,593 kg 258,555 kg 84,963 kg Uruguay
2020s 176,635 kg 211,742 kg 35,107 kg Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — losses from manure treated, New Caledonia or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 200,909 kg against 177,469 kg in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — losses from manure treated between New Caledonia and Uruguay?
23,440 kg, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do New Caledonia and Uruguay rank globally for swine — losses from manure treated?
New Caledonia ranks 113th and Uruguay ranks 112th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Uruguay: Swine — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/new-caledonia/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/new-caledonia/uruguay/">New Caledonia vs Uruguay: Swine — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).