Tonga vs Zimbabwe: Swine — Losses from manure treated

Tonga
398,110 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
333,758 kg
in 2023
Tonga rank
106th
Zimbabwe rank
109th

Swine — Losses from manure treated over time

  • Tonga
  • Zimbabwe
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k600.0k196119922023

How they compare

Tonga currently reports 398,110 kg against 333,758 kg in Zimbabwe, a difference of 64,352 kg.

That makes Tonga's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Tonga ranks 106th and Zimbabwe ranks 109th of 188 countries.

Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tonga Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 135,950 kg 129,344 kg 6,605 kg Tonga
1970s 275,395 kg 179,982 kg 95,413 kg Tonga
1980s 455,920 kg 184,580 kg 271,340 kg Tonga
1990s 411,897 kg 246,040 kg 165,856 kg Tonga
2000s 383,883 kg 227,805 kg 156,078 kg Tonga
2010s 392,390 kg 280,339 kg 112,050 kg Tonga
2020s 397,430 kg 292,747 kg 104,684 kg Tonga

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — losses from manure treated, Tonga or Zimbabwe?
Tonga, at 398,110 kg against 333,758 kg in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — losses from manure treated between Tonga and Zimbabwe?
64,352 kg, with Tonga ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tonga and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Tonga and Zimbabwe rank globally for swine — losses from manure treated?
Tonga ranks 106th and Zimbabwe ranks 109th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tonga vs Zimbabwe: Swine — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/tonga/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/tonga/zimbabwe/">Tonga vs Zimbabwe: Swine — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).