Australia vs El Salvador: Swine — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita

Australia
0.5707 kg per person
in 2023
El Salvador
0.5402 kg per person
in 2023
Australia rank
89th
El Salvador rank
91st

Swine — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita over time

  • Australia
  • El Salvador
0.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.5707 kg per person against 0.5402 kg per person in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0305 kg per person.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.

Australia ranks 89th and El Salvador ranks 91st of 149 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and El Salvador in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia El Salvador Difference Ahead
1960s 0.9405 kg per person 1.73 kg per person 0.7883 kg per person El Salvador
1970s 1.14 kg per person 1.58 kg per person 0.4467 kg per person El Salvador
1980s 0.9953 kg per person 1.1 kg per person 0.1091 kg per person El Salvador
1990s 0.9117 kg per person 0.6066 kg per person 0.3052 kg per person Australia
2000s 0.7958 kg per person 0.8502 kg per person 0.0544 kg per person El Salvador
2010s 0.5997 kg per person 0.6405 kg per person 0.0408 kg per person El Salvador
2020s 0.584 kg per person 0.5436 kg per person 0.0403 kg per person Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — manure applied to soils (n content), per capita, Australia or El Salvador?
Australia, at 0.5707 kg per person against 0.5402 kg per person in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — manure applied to soils (n content), per capita between Australia and El Salvador?
0.0305 kg per person, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and El Salvador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and El Salvador rank globally for swine — manure applied to soils (n content), per capita?
Australia ranks 89th and El Salvador ranks 91st of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs El Salvador: Swine — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-capita/australia/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-capita/australia/el-salvador/">Australia vs El Salvador: Swine — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita
Unit
kg per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine — Manure applied to soils (N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.