Sao Tome and Principe vs Spain: Swine — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre

Sao Tome and Principe
647.9 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Spain
538.38 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe rank
11th
Spain rank
12th

Swine — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Spain
0200400600196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 647.9 kg per square kilometre against 538.38 kg per square kilometre in Spain, a difference of 109.52 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.2 times Spain's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Spain ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 11th and Spain ranks 12th of 149 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 2 and Spain in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Spain Difference Ahead
1960s 65.72 kg per square kilometre 88.89 kg per square kilometre 23.17 kg per square kilometre Spain
1970s 50.18 kg per square kilometre 131.75 kg per square kilometre 81.58 kg per square kilometre Spain
1980s 33.78 kg per square kilometre 209.73 kg per square kilometre 175.96 kg per square kilometre Spain
1990s 31.86 kg per square kilometre 293.39 kg per square kilometre 261.53 kg per square kilometre Spain
2000s 170.36 kg per square kilometre 393.2 kg per square kilometre 222.85 kg per square kilometre Spain
2010s 496.97 kg per square kilometre 443.09 kg per square kilometre 53.89 kg per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 609.33 kg per square kilometre 538.06 kg per square kilometre 71.27 kg per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — manure applied to soils (n content), per square kilometre, Sao Tome and Principe or Spain?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 647.9 kg per square kilometre against 538.38 kg per square kilometre in Spain as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — manure applied to soils (n content), per square kilometre between Sao Tome and Principe and Spain?
109.52 kg per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Spain?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Spain rank globally for swine — manure applied to soils (n content), per square kilometre?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 11th and Spain ranks 12th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Spain: Swine — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-square-kilometre/sao-tome-and-principe/spain/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-square-kilometre/sao-tome-and-principe/spain/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Spain: Swine — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine — Manure applied to soils (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.