Barbados vs Solomon Islands: Swine — Manure applied to soils

Barbados
324,735 kg
in 2023
Solomon Islands
342,909 kg
in 2023
Barbados rank
130th
Solomon Islands rank
128th

Swine — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Barbados
  • Solomon Islands
200.0k400.0k600.0k196119922023

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 342,909 kg against 324,735 kg in Barbados, a difference of 18,174 kg.

That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 130th and Solomon Islands ranks 128th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 4 and Solomon Islands in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 362,275 kg 143,715 kg 218,559 kg Barbados
1970s 508,413 kg 239,739 kg 268,674 kg Barbados
1980s 515,179 kg 300,571 kg 214,608 kg Barbados
1990s 337,169 kg 327,363 kg 9,806 kg Barbados
2000s 247,851 kg 331,675 kg 83,823 kg Solomon Islands
2010s 308,701 kg 337,754 kg 29,053 kg Solomon Islands
2020s 324,735 kg 342,378 kg 17,643 kg Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — manure applied to soils, Barbados or Solomon Islands?
Solomon Islands, at 342,909 kg against 324,735 kg in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — manure applied to soils between Barbados and Solomon Islands?
18,174 kg, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Solomon Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Solomon Islands rank globally for swine — manure applied to soils?
Barbados ranks 130th and Solomon Islands ranks 128th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Solomon Islands: Swine — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/barbados/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/barbados/solomon-islands/">Barbados vs Solomon Islands: Swine — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).