Benin vs Ecuador: Swine — Manure applied to soils

Benin
14.20 million kg
in 2023
Ecuador
13.59 million kg
in 2023
Benin rank
64th
Ecuador rank
66th

Swine — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Benin
  • Ecuador
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M50.0M196119922023

How they compare

Benin currently reports 14.20 million kg against 13.59 million kg in Ecuador, a difference of 601,600 kg.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Benin ranks 64th and Ecuador ranks 66th of 188 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Benin Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 4.38 million kg 22.03 million kg 17.65 million kg Ecuador
1970s 5.33 million kg 34.90 million kg 29.57 million kg Ecuador
1980s 7.27 million kg 38.49 million kg 31.21 million kg Ecuador
1990s 6.61 million kg 34.20 million kg 27.58 million kg Ecuador
2000s 4.28 million kg 19.44 million kg 15.15 million kg Ecuador
2010s 6.26 million kg 19.28 million kg 13.02 million kg Ecuador
2020s 12.36 million kg 13.96 million kg 1.60 million kg Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — manure applied to soils, Benin or Ecuador?
Benin, at 14.20 million kg against 13.59 million kg in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — manure applied to soils between Benin and Ecuador?
601,600 kg, with Benin ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Ecuador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Benin and Ecuador rank globally for swine — manure applied to soils?
Benin ranks 64th and Ecuador ranks 66th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benin vs Ecuador: Swine — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/benin/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/benin/ecuador/">Benin vs Ecuador: Swine — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).