Bhutan vs Equatorial Guinea: Swine — Manure applied to soils

Bhutan
95,685 kg
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
106,040 kg
in 2023
Bhutan rank
166th
Equatorial Guinea rank
163rd

Swine — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Bhutan
  • Equatorial Guinea
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 106,040 kg against 95,685 kg in Bhutan, a difference of 10,355 kg.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 166th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 163rd of 188 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 5 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 154,389 kg 50,738 kg 103,650 kg Bhutan
1970s 168,665 kg 60,178 kg 108,487 kg Bhutan
1980s 204,741 kg 65,558 kg 139,182 kg Bhutan
1990s 163,871 kg 77,169 kg 86,702 kg Bhutan
2000s 105,513 kg 87,506 kg 18,007 kg Bhutan
2010s 58,589 kg 96,742 kg 38,153 kg Equatorial Guinea
2020s 83,362 kg 104,592 kg 21,231 kg Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — manure applied to soils, Bhutan or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 106,040 kg against 95,685 kg in Bhutan as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — manure applied to soils between Bhutan and Equatorial Guinea?
10,355 kg, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Equatorial Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for swine — manure applied to soils?
Bhutan ranks 166th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 163rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Equatorial Guinea: Swine — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/bhutan/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/bhutan/equatorial-guinea/">Bhutan vs Equatorial Guinea: Swine — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).