Dominican Republic vs Papua New Guinea: Swine — Manure applied to soils

Dominican Republic
11.80 million kg
in 2023
Papua New Guinea
13.16 million kg
in 2023
Dominican Republic rank
65th
Papua New Guinea rank
62nd

Swine — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Papua New Guinea
05.0M10.0M15.0M196119922023

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 13.16 million kg against 11.80 million kg in Dominican Republic, a difference of 1.36 million kg.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Dominican Republic's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 65th and Papua New Guinea ranks 62nd of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 4 and Papua New Guinea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 9.79 million kg 3.96 million kg 5.83 million kg Dominican Republic
1970s 9.87 million kg 4.82 million kg 5.05 million kg Dominican Republic
1980s 4.38 million kg 5.73 million kg 1.35 million kg Papua New Guinea
1990s 11.14 million kg 8.04 million kg 3.10 million kg Dominican Republic
2000s 8.44 million kg 10.99 million kg 2.55 million kg Papua New Guinea
2010s 8.96 million kg 12.40 million kg 3.44 million kg Papua New Guinea
2020s 13.48 million kg 12.89 million kg 584,050 kg Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — manure applied to soils, Dominican Republic or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 13.16 million kg against 11.80 million kg in Dominican Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — manure applied to soils between Dominican Republic and Papua New Guinea?
1.36 million kg, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Papua New Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Dominican Republic and Papua New Guinea rank globally for swine — manure applied to soils?
Dominican Republic ranks 65th and Papua New Guinea ranks 62nd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Papua New Guinea: Swine — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/dominican-republic/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/dominican-republic/papua-new-guinea/">Dominican Republic vs Papua New Guinea: Swine — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).