Ecuador vs Kenya: Swine — Manure applied to soils

Ecuador
13.59 million kg
in 2023
Kenya
11.90 million kg
in 2023
Ecuador rank
66th
Kenya rank
69th

Swine — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Ecuador
  • Kenya
020.0M40.0M60.0M196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 13.59 million kg against 11.90 million kg in Kenya, a difference of 1.70 million kg.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Kenya's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 66th and Kenya ranks 69th of 188 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Kenya Difference Ahead
1960s 22.03 million kg 783,648 kg 21.24 million kg Ecuador
1970s 34.90 million kg 880,720 kg 34.02 million kg Ecuador
1980s 38.49 million kg 1.29 million kg 37.20 million kg Ecuador
1990s 34.20 million kg 3.33 million kg 30.87 million kg Ecuador
2000s 19.44 million kg 4.83 million kg 14.60 million kg Ecuador
2010s 19.28 million kg 6.58 million kg 12.69 million kg Ecuador
2020s 13.96 million kg 10.47 million kg 3.49 million kg Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — manure applied to soils, Ecuador or Kenya?
Ecuador, at 13.59 million kg against 11.90 million kg in Kenya as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — manure applied to soils between Ecuador and Kenya?
1.70 million kg, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kenya?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Kenya rank globally for swine — manure applied to soils?
Ecuador ranks 66th and Kenya ranks 69th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Kenya: Swine — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/ecuador/kenya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/ecuador/kenya/">Ecuador vs Kenya: Swine — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).