Equatorial Guinea vs Kyrgyzstan: Swine — Manure applied to soils

Equatorial Guinea
106,040 kg
in 2023
Kyrgyzstan
98,745 kg
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
150th
Kyrgyzstan rank
152nd

Swine — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Kyrgyzstan
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 106,040 kg against 98,745 kg in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 7,295 kg.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 150th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 152nd of 172 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
1990s 78,585 kg 537,162 kg 458,577 kg Kyrgyzstan
2000s 87,506 kg 279,054 kg 191,548 kg Kyrgyzstan
2010s 96,742 kg 171,876 kg 75,134 kg Kyrgyzstan
2020s 104,592 kg 95,072 kg 9,520 kg Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — manure applied to soils, Equatorial Guinea or Kyrgyzstan?
Equatorial Guinea, at 106,040 kg against 98,745 kg in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — manure applied to soils between Equatorial Guinea and Kyrgyzstan?
7,295 kg, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Kyrgyzstan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for swine — manure applied to soils?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 150th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 152nd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Kyrgyzstan: Swine — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/equatorial-guinea/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/equatorial-guinea/kyrgyz-republic/">Equatorial Guinea vs Kyrgyzstan: Swine — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).