Ethiopia PDR vs New Caledonia: Swine — Manure applied to soils

Ethiopia PDR
283,190 kg
in 1992
New Caledonia
230,811 kg
in 2023
Ethiopia PDR rank
136th
New Caledonia rank
137th

Swine — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Ethiopia PDR
  • New Caledonia
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ethiopia PDR currently reports 283,190 kg against 230,811 kg in New Caledonia, a difference of 52,379 kg.

That makes Ethiopia PDR's figure about 1.2 times New Caledonia's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.

Ethiopia PDR ranks 136th and New Caledonia ranks 137th of 172 countries.

Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia PDR New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 171,330 kg 121,200 kg 50,130 kg Ethiopia PDR
1970s 232,923 kg 126,084 kg 106,839 kg Ethiopia PDR
1980s 262,234 kg 189,960 kg 72,273 kg Ethiopia PDR
1990s 276,110 kg 196,488 kg 79,622 kg Ethiopia PDR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — manure applied to soils, Ethiopia PDR or New Caledonia?
Ethiopia PDR, at 283,190 kg against 230,811 kg in New Caledonia as of 1992.
What is the difference in swine — manure applied to soils between Ethiopia PDR and New Caledonia?
52,379 kg, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and New Caledonia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
How do Ethiopia PDR and New Caledonia rank globally for swine — manure applied to soils?
Ethiopia PDR ranks 136th and New Caledonia ranks 137th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia PDR vs New Caledonia: Swine — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/ethiopia-pdr/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/ethiopia-pdr/new-caledonia/">Ethiopia PDR vs New Caledonia: Swine — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).