Ethiopia vs Puerto Rico: Swine — Manure applied to soils

Ethiopia
523,589 kg
in 2023
Puerto Rico
574,134 kg
in 2023
Ethiopia rank
118th
Puerto Rico rank
117th

Swine — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Puerto Rico
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M5.0M196119922023

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 574,134 kg against 523,589 kg in Ethiopia, a difference of 50,545 kg.

That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Ethiopia ranks 118th and Puerto Rico ranks 117th of 172 countries.

Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1990s 313,532 kg 2.38 million kg 2.07 million kg Puerto Rico
2000s 395,049 kg 960,042 kg 564,992 kg Puerto Rico
2010s 477,905 kg 628,906 kg 151,001 kg Puerto Rico
2020s 511,639 kg 574,137 kg 62,498 kg Puerto Rico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — manure applied to soils, Ethiopia or Puerto Rico?
Puerto Rico, at 574,134 kg against 523,589 kg in Ethiopia as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — manure applied to soils between Ethiopia and Puerto Rico?
50,545 kg, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Puerto Rico?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Ethiopia and Puerto Rico rank globally for swine — manure applied to soils?
Ethiopia ranks 118th and Puerto Rico ranks 117th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia vs Puerto Rico: Swine — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/ethiopia/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/ethiopia/puerto-rico-us/">Ethiopia vs Puerto Rico: Swine — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).