Polynesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Swine — Manure applied to soils

Polynesia
1.55 million kg
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
7.56 million kg
in 2023
Polynesia rank
14th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
12th

Swine — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Polynesia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 7.56 million kg against 1.55 million kg in Polynesia, a difference of 6.01 million kg.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 4.9 times Polynesia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Polynesia ranks 14th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 12th of 20 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Polynesia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 572,585 kg 1.45 million kg 878,290 kg United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 891,361 kg 1.92 million kg 1.03 million kg United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 1.83 million kg 3.29 million kg 1.46 million kg United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 2.11 million kg 5.12 million kg 3.01 million kg United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 2.15 million kg 6.61 million kg 4.46 million kg United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 1.94 million kg 7.20 million kg 5.25 million kg United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 1.56 million kg 7.51 million kg 5.95 million kg United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — manure applied to soils, Polynesia or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 7.56 million kg against 1.55 million kg in Polynesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — manure applied to soils between Polynesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
6.01 million kg, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Polynesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Polynesia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for swine — manure applied to soils?
Polynesia ranks 14th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 12th of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Polynesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Swine — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/polynesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/polynesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Polynesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Swine — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).