Ethiopia PDR vs New Caledonia: Swine — Manure applied to soils that leaches

Ethiopia PDR
84,957 kg
in 1992
New Caledonia
69,243 kg
in 2023
Ethiopia PDR rank
136th
New Caledonia rank
137th

Swine — Manure applied to soils that leaches over time

  • Ethiopia PDR
  • New Caledonia
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ethiopia PDR currently reports 84,957 kg against 69,243 kg in New Caledonia, a difference of 15,714 kg.

That makes Ethiopia PDR's figure about 1.2 times New Caledonia's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.

Ethiopia PDR ranks 136th and New Caledonia ranks 137th of 172 countries.

Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia PDR New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 51,399 kg 36,360 kg 15,039 kg Ethiopia PDR
1970s 69,877 kg 37,825 kg 32,052 kg Ethiopia PDR
1980s 78,670 kg 56,988 kg 21,682 kg Ethiopia PDR
1990s 82,833 kg 58,946 kg 23,887 kg Ethiopia PDR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — manure applied to soils that leaches, Ethiopia PDR or New Caledonia?
Ethiopia PDR, at 84,957 kg against 69,243 kg in New Caledonia as of 1992.
What is the difference in swine — manure applied to soils that leaches between Ethiopia PDR and New Caledonia?
15,714 kg, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and New Caledonia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
How do Ethiopia PDR and New Caledonia rank globally for swine — manure applied to soils that leaches?
Ethiopia PDR ranks 136th and New Caledonia ranks 137th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia PDR vs New Caledonia: Swine — Manure applied to soils that leaches. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-that-leaches-n-content/ethiopia-pdr/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-that-leaches-n-content/ethiopia-pdr/new-caledonia/">Ethiopia PDR vs New Caledonia: Swine — Manure applied to soils that leaches</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).