How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Zimbabwe?

51 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2020.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per

Cuba

0 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2020

Zimbabwe

0 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Cuba rank

46th

Zimbabwe rank

47th

Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per over time

Cuba
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 kg per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 46th and Zimbabwe ranks 47th of 149 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cuba	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP	Cuba
1980s	0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	Cuba
1990s	0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	Cuba
2000s	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
2010s	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Cuba
2020s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), per, Cuba or Zimbabwe?: Cuba, at 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
What is the difference in swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), per between Cuba and Zimbabwe?: 0 kg per US$ of GDP, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Zimbabwe?: 51 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2020.
How do Cuba and Zimbabwe rank globally for swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), per?: Cuba ranks 46th and Zimbabwe ranks 47th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/cuba/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/cuba/zimbabwe/">Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per unit of GDP
Unit: kg per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 151 places, 8,190 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 25 September 2026

Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.