Barbados vs Mauritius: Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Barbados
64,947 kg
in 2023
Mauritius
60,144 kg
in 2023
Barbados rank
130th
Mauritius rank
132nd

Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Barbados
  • Mauritius
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 64,947 kg against 60,144 kg in Mauritius, a difference of 4,803 kg.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 130th and Mauritius ranks 132nd of 172 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 72,455 kg 12,114 kg 60,341 kg Barbados
1970s 101,683 kg 14,556 kg 87,127 kg Barbados
1980s 103,036 kg 28,166 kg 74,870 kg Barbados
1990s 67,434 kg 40,298 kg 27,136 kg Barbados
2000s 49,570 kg 37,415 kg 12,155 kg Barbados
2010s 61,740 kg 57,346 kg 4,394 kg Barbados
2020s 64,947 kg 60,810 kg 4,137 kg Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Barbados or Mauritius?
Barbados, at 64,947 kg against 60,144 kg in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Barbados and Mauritius?
4,803 kg, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Mauritius rank globally for swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Barbados ranks 130th and Mauritius ranks 132nd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Mauritius: Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/barbados/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/barbados/mauritius/">Barbados vs Mauritius: Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).