Botswana vs Cook Islands: Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Botswana
24,071 kg
in 2023
Cook Islands
28,759 kg
in 2023
Botswana rank
147th
Cook Islands rank
144th

Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Botswana
  • Cook Islands
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Cook Islands currently reports 28,759 kg against 24,071 kg in Botswana, a difference of 4,688 kg.

That makes Cook Islands's figure about 1.2 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 147th and Cook Islands ranks 144th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 3 and Cook Islands in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Cook Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 20,522 kg 12,392 kg 8,130 kg Botswana
1970s 37,644 kg 14,648 kg 22,996 kg Botswana
1980s 24,907 kg 20,679 kg 4,228 kg Botswana
1990s 16,765 kg 37,377 kg 20,612 kg Cook Islands
2000s 25,841 kg 39,292 kg 13,451 kg Cook Islands
2010s 8,981 kg 38,652 kg 29,671 kg Cook Islands
2020s 18,434 kg 30,635 kg 12,201 kg Cook Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Botswana or Cook Islands?
Cook Islands, at 28,759 kg against 24,071 kg in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Botswana and Cook Islands?
4,688 kg, with Cook Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Cook Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Cook Islands rank globally for swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Botswana ranks 147th and Cook Islands ranks 144th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Cook Islands: Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/botswana/cook-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/botswana/cook-islands/">Botswana vs Cook Islands: Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).