China, Hong Kong SAR vs Solomon Islands: Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

China, Hong Kong SAR
77,660 kg
in 2023
Solomon Islands
68,582 kg
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
126th
Solomon Islands rank
128th

Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Solomon Islands
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 77,660 kg against 68,582 kg in Solomon Islands, a difference of 9,078 kg.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 1.1 times Solomon Islands's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 126th and Solomon Islands ranks 128th of 172 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 196,956 kg 28,743 kg 168,213 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 298,291 kg 47,948 kg 250,343 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 294,501 kg 60,114 kg 234,387 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 110,993 kg 65,473 kg 45,520 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 124,912 kg 66,335 kg 58,577 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 90,917 kg 67,551 kg 23,366 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 77,659 kg 68,476 kg 9,184 kg China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises, China, Hong Kong SAR or Solomon Islands?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 77,660 kg against 68,582 kg in Solomon Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises between China, Hong Kong SAR and Solomon Islands?
9,078 kg, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Solomon Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Solomon Islands rank globally for swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 126th and Solomon Islands ranks 128th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Solomon Islands: Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/solomon-islands/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Solomon Islands: Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).