China, Hong Kong SAR vs Trinidad and Tobago: Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

China, Hong Kong SAR
77,660 kg
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
78,406 kg
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
126th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
125th

Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Trinidad and Tobago
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 78,406 kg against 77,660 kg in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 746 kg.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 126th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 125th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 6 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 196,956 kg 89,341 kg 107,616 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 298,291 kg 128,485 kg 169,806 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 294,501 kg 145,229 kg 149,271 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 110,993 kg 96,985 kg 14,008 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 124,912 kg 112,751 kg 12,160 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 90,917 kg 84,851 kg 6,066 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 77,659 kg 84,914 kg 7,255 kg Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises, China, Hong Kong SAR or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 78,406 kg against 77,660 kg in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises between China, Hong Kong SAR and Trinidad and Tobago?
746 kg, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 126th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 125th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Trinidad and Tobago: Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/trinidad-and-tobago/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Trinidad and Tobago: Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).