Congo vs New Zealand: Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Congo
292,492 kg
in 2023
New Zealand
307,710 kg
in 2023
Congo rank
107th
New Zealand rank
106th

Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Congo
  • New Zealand
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M196119922023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 307,710 kg against 292,492 kg in Congo, a difference of 15,218 kg.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Zealand ahead.

Congo ranks 107th and New Zealand ranks 106th of 172 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 70,168 kg 825,559 kg 755,391 kg New Zealand
1970s 112,410 kg 591,242 kg 478,832 kg New Zealand
1980s 98,188 kg 522,897 kg 424,709 kg New Zealand
1990s 140,179 kg 494,288 kg 354,109 kg New Zealand
2000s 190,486 kg 436,341 kg 245,854 kg New Zealand
2010s 270,067 kg 357,242 kg 87,175 kg New Zealand
2020s 289,157 kg 310,529 kg 21,372 kg New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Congo or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 307,710 kg against 292,492 kg in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Congo and New Zealand?
15,218 kg, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and New Zealand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and New Zealand rank globally for swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Congo ranks 107th and New Zealand ranks 106th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs New Zealand: Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/congo-rep/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/congo-rep/new-zealand/">Congo vs New Zealand: Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).