Cyprus vs Zimbabwe: Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Cyprus
827,501 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1.03 million kg
in 2023
Cyprus rank
85th
Zimbabwe rank
83rd

Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Cyprus
  • Zimbabwe
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 1.03 million kg against 827,501 kg in Cyprus, a difference of 200,209 kg.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Cyprus's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Cyprus ranks 85th and Zimbabwe ranks 83rd of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 135,946 kg 398,279 kg 262,334 kg Zimbabwe
1970s 360,055 kg 554,202 kg 194,147 kg Zimbabwe
1980s 580,341 kg 568,361 kg 11,980 kg Cyprus
1990s 982,811 kg 757,611 kg 225,200 kg Cyprus
2000s 1.22 million kg 701,460 kg 519,908 kg Cyprus
2010s 1.01 million kg 863,224 kg 144,563 kg Cyprus
2020s 908,472 kg 901,429 kg 7,043 kg Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Cyprus or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 1.03 million kg against 827,501 kg in Cyprus as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Cyprus and Zimbabwe?
200,209 kg, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cyprus and Zimbabwe rank globally for swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Cyprus ranks 85th and Zimbabwe ranks 83rd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs Zimbabwe: Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/cyprus/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/cyprus/zimbabwe/">Cyprus vs Zimbabwe: Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).