Ethiopia PDR vs Malta: Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Ethiopia PDR
56,638 kg
in 1992
Malta
56,968 kg
in 2023
Ethiopia PDR rank
136th
Malta rank
134th

Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Ethiopia PDR
  • Malta
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 56,968 kg against 56,638 kg in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 330 kg.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ethiopia PDR ahead.

Ethiopia PDR ranks 136th and Malta ranks 134th of 172 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia PDR averaged higher in 2 and Malta in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia PDR Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 34,266 kg 31,508 kg 2,758 kg Ethiopia PDR
1970s 46,585 kg 36,458 kg 10,127 kg Ethiopia PDR
1980s 52,447 kg 106,080 kg 53,633 kg Malta
1990s 55,222 kg 164,319 kg 109,097 kg Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Ethiopia PDR or Malta?
Malta, at 56,968 kg against 56,638 kg in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Ethiopia PDR and Malta?
330 kg, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Malta?
32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
How do Ethiopia PDR and Malta rank globally for swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Ethiopia PDR ranks 136th and Malta ranks 134th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia PDR vs Malta: Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/ethiopia-pdr/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/ethiopia-pdr/malta/">Ethiopia PDR vs Malta: Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).