Malta vs New Caledonia: Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Malta
56,968 kg
in 2023
New Caledonia
46,162 kg
in 2023
Malta rank
134th
New Caledonia rank
137th

Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Malta
  • New Caledonia
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 56,968 kg against 46,162 kg in New Caledonia, a difference of 10,806 kg.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 134th and New Caledonia ranks 137th of 172 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 31,508 kg 24,240 kg 7,268 kg Malta
1970s 36,458 kg 25,217 kg 11,241 kg Malta
1980s 106,080 kg 37,992 kg 68,088 kg Malta
1990s 145,118 kg 35,761 kg 109,357 kg Malta
2000s 120,780 kg 37,737 kg 83,042 kg Malta
2010s 71,470 kg 45,154 kg 26,316 kg Malta
2020s 57,891 kg 45,945 kg 11,946 kg Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Malta or New Caledonia?
Malta, at 56,968 kg against 46,162 kg in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Malta and New Caledonia?
10,806 kg, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and New Caledonia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malta and New Caledonia rank globally for swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Malta ranks 134th and New Caledonia ranks 137th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs New Caledonia: Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/malta/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/malta/new-caledonia/">Malta vs New Caledonia: Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).