Panama vs Zimbabwe: Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Panama
1.16 million kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1.03 million kg
in 2023
Panama rank
82nd
Zimbabwe rank
83rd

Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Panama
  • Zimbabwe
400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M1.2M196119922023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 1.16 million kg against 1.03 million kg in Zimbabwe, a difference of 132,960 kg.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Panama ahead.

Panama ranks 82nd and Zimbabwe ranks 83rd of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 524,896 kg 398,279 kg 126,617 kg Panama
1970s 499,866 kg 554,202 kg 54,335 kg Zimbabwe
1980s 587,054 kg 568,361 kg 18,692 kg Panama
1990s 711,022 kg 757,611 kg 46,589 kg Zimbabwe
2000s 822,383 kg 701,460 kg 120,922 kg Panama
2010s 963,448 kg 863,224 kg 100,224 kg Panama
2020s 1.11 million kg 901,429 kg 208,704 kg Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Panama or Zimbabwe?
Panama, at 1.16 million kg against 1.03 million kg in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Panama and Zimbabwe?
132,960 kg, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Panama and Zimbabwe rank globally for swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Panama ranks 82nd and Zimbabwe ranks 83rd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Zimbabwe: Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/panama/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/panama/zimbabwe/">Panama vs Zimbabwe: Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).