Guinea-Bissau vs Jamaica: Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content), annual growth

Guinea-Bissau
0.5253 % change on previous year
in 2023
Jamaica
0.4598 % change on previous year
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
75th
Jamaica rank
76th

Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content), annual growth over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Jamaica
-40-2002040196219922023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.5253 % change on previous year against 0.4598 % change on previous year in Jamaica, a difference of 0.0655 % change on previous year.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Jamaica's.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Jamaica ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 75th and Jamaica ranks 76th of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 5 and Jamaica in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Jamaica Difference Ahead
1960s 0 % change on previous year 3.81 % change on previous year 3.81 % change on previous year Jamaica
1970s 4.01 % change on previous year 1.74 % change on previous year 2.26 % change on previous year Guinea-Bissau
1980s 1.62 % change on previous year 0.9773 % change on previous year 0.6466 % change on previous year Guinea-Bissau
1990s 1.76 % change on previous year -0.4962 % change on previous year 2.25 % change on previous year Guinea-Bissau
2000s 1.82 % change on previous year 3.34 % change on previous year 1.52 % change on previous year Jamaica
2010s 2.9 % change on previous year -0.2078 % change on previous year 3.11 % change on previous year Guinea-Bissau
2020s 0.6601 % change on previous year 0.3266 % change on previous year 0.3335 % change on previous year Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — manure management (manure treated, n content), annual growth, Guinea-Bissau or Jamaica?
Guinea-Bissau, at 0.5253 % change on previous year against 0.4598 % change on previous year in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — manure management (manure treated, n content), annual growth between Guinea-Bissau and Jamaica?
0.0655 % change on previous year, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Jamaica?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Jamaica rank globally for swine — manure management (manure treated, n content), annual growth?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 75th and Jamaica ranks 76th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Jamaica: Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content), annual growth. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/guinea-bissau/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/guinea-bissau/jamaica/">Guinea-Bissau vs Jamaica: Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content), annual growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 12,687 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.