Chile vs Papua New Guinea: Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per capita

Chile
2.15 kg per person
in 2023
Papua New Guinea
2.23 kg per person
in 2023
Chile rank
32nd
Papua New Guinea rank
31st

Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per capita over time

  • Chile
  • Papua New Guinea
0123196119922023

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 2.23 kg per person against 2.15 kg per person in Chile, a difference of 0.08 kg per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Chile ranks 32nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 31st of 149 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 1.63 kg per person 3.12 kg per person 1.48 kg per person Papua New Guinea
1970s 1.36 kg per person 3.05 kg per person 1.69 kg per person Papua New Guinea
1980s 1.39 kg per person 2.93 kg per person 1.53 kg per person Papua New Guinea
1990s 1.52 kg per person 3.07 kg per person 1.56 kg per person Papua New Guinea
2000s 2.25 kg per person 3.02 kg per person 0.774 kg per person Papua New Guinea
2010s 2.26 kg per person 2.55 kg per person 0.2891 kg per person Papua New Guinea
2020s 2.15 kg per person 2.25 kg per person 0.1006 kg per person Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — manure management (manure treated, n content), per capita, Chile or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 2.23 kg per person against 2.15 kg per person in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — manure management (manure treated, n content), per capita between Chile and Papua New Guinea?
0.08 kg per person, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Papua New Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Papua New Guinea rank globally for swine — manure management (manure treated, n content), per capita?
Chile ranks 32nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 31st of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Papua New Guinea: Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/chile/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/chile/papua-new-guinea/">Chile vs Papua New Guinea: Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per capita
Unit
kg per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.