Cuba vs Dominican Republic: Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square

Cuba
251.29 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominican Republic
265.97 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
33rd
Dominican Republic rank
31st

Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square over time

  • Cuba
  • Dominican Republic
0100200300400196119922023

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 265.97 kg per square kilometre against 251.29 kg per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 14.68 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Cuba ranks 33rd and Dominican Republic ranks 31st of 149 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 4 and Dominican Republic in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Dominican Republic Difference Ahead
1960s 209.28 kg per square kilometre 219.98 kg per square kilometre 10.7 kg per square kilometre Dominican Republic
1970s 202.78 kg per square kilometre 221.77 kg per square kilometre 18.99 kg per square kilometre Dominican Republic
1980s 234.07 kg per square kilometre 98.38 kg per square kilometre 135.69 kg per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 251.05 kg per square kilometre 250.31 kg per square kilometre 0.7456 kg per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 234.76 kg per square kilometre 189.73 kg per square kilometre 45.03 kg per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 266.56 kg per square kilometre 201.47 kg per square kilometre 65.09 kg per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 194.8 kg per square kilometre 303.68 kg per square kilometre 108.88 kg per square kilometre Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — manure management (manure treated, n content), per square, Cuba or Dominican Republic?
Dominican Republic, at 265.97 kg per square kilometre against 251.29 kg per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — manure management (manure treated, n content), per square between Cuba and Dominican Republic?
14.68 kg per square kilometre, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Dominican Republic?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Dominican Republic rank globally for swine — manure management (manure treated, n content), per square?
Cuba ranks 33rd and Dominican Republic ranks 31st of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Dominican Republic: Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/cuba/dominican-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/cuba/dominican-republic/">Cuba vs Dominican Republic: Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.