Czechia vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square

Czechia
212.83 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
234.51 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Czechia rank
38th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
36th

Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square over time

  • Czechia
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
200400600800196119922023

How they compare

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 234.51 kg per square kilometre against 212.83 kg per square kilometre in Czechia, a difference of 21.68 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.

Czechia ranks 38th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 36th of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 3 and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
1990s 638.49 kg per square kilometre 359.96 kg per square kilometre 278.53 kg per square kilometre Czechia
2000s 470.69 kg per square kilometre 356.92 kg per square kilometre 113.77 kg per square kilometre Czechia
2010s 251.64 kg per square kilometre 250.95 kg per square kilometre 0.6941 kg per square kilometre Czechia
2020s 223.78 kg per square kilometre 239.36 kg per square kilometre 15.58 kg per square kilometre Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — manure management (manure treated, n content), per square, Czechia or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 234.51 kg per square kilometre against 212.83 kg per square kilometre in Czechia as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — manure management (manure treated, n content), per square between Czechia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
21.68 kg per square kilometre, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Czechia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for swine — manure management (manure treated, n content), per square?
Czechia ranks 38th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 36th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/czechia/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/czechia/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">Czechia vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.