Bhutan vs Equatorial Guinea: Swine — Manure management

Bhutan
121,713 kg
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
112,357 kg
in 2023
Bhutan rank
150th
Equatorial Guinea rank
153rd

Swine — Manure management over time

  • Bhutan
  • Equatorial Guinea
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 121,713 kg against 112,357 kg in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 9,356 kg.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 150th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 153rd of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 5 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 196,383 kg 53,761 kg 142,623 kg Bhutan
1970s 214,543 kg 63,763 kg 150,780 kg Bhutan
1980s 260,432 kg 69,464 kg 190,968 kg Bhutan
1990s 208,446 kg 81,766 kg 126,679 kg Bhutan
2000s 134,213 kg 92,718 kg 41,495 kg Bhutan
2010s 74,525 kg 102,505 kg 27,980 kg Equatorial Guinea
2020s 106,037 kg 110,823 kg 4,786 kg Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — manure management, Bhutan or Equatorial Guinea?
Bhutan, at 121,713 kg against 112,357 kg in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — manure management between Bhutan and Equatorial Guinea?
9,356 kg, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Equatorial Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for swine — manure management?
Bhutan ranks 150th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 153rd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Equatorial Guinea: Swine — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/bhutan/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/bhutan/equatorial-guinea/">Bhutan vs Equatorial Guinea: Swine — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).