China, Hong Kong SAR vs Ethiopia: Swine — Manure management

China, Hong Kong SAR
479,438 kg
in 2023
Ethiopia
554,779 kg
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
126th
Ethiopia rank
123rd

Swine — Manure management over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Ethiopia
500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M2.5M196119922023

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 554,779 kg against 479,438 kg in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 75,341 kg.

That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.2 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 126th and Ethiopia ranks 123rd of 172 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 3 and Ethiopia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Ethiopia Difference Ahead
1990s 560,127 kg 332,208 kg 227,919 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 771,154 kg 418,583 kg 352,571 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 561,283 kg 506,374 kg 54,909 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 479,437 kg 542,117 kg 62,680 kg Ethiopia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — manure management, China, Hong Kong SAR or Ethiopia?
Ethiopia, at 554,779 kg against 479,438 kg in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — manure management between China, Hong Kong SAR and Ethiopia?
75,341 kg, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Ethiopia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Ethiopia rank globally for swine — manure management?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 126th and Ethiopia ranks 123rd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Ethiopia: Swine — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/ethiopia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/ethiopia/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Ethiopia: Swine — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).