China, Hong Kong SAR vs Trinidad and Tobago: Swine — Manure management

China, Hong Kong SAR
479,438 kg
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
425,724 kg
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
126th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
127th

Swine — Manure management over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Trinidad and Tobago
500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M2.5M196119922023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 479,438 kg against 425,724 kg in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 53,714 kg.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 126th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 127th of 172 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 1.22 million kg 485,096 kg 730,831 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 1.84 million kg 697,638 kg 1.14 million kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 1.82 million kg 788,556 kg 1.03 million kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 685,226 kg 526,604 kg 158,622 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 771,154 kg 612,209 kg 158,945 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 561,283 kg 460,717 kg 100,566 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 479,437 kg 461,060 kg 18,378 kg China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — manure management, China, Hong Kong SAR or Trinidad and Tobago?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 479,438 kg against 425,724 kg in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — manure management between China, Hong Kong SAR and Trinidad and Tobago?
53,714 kg, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for swine — manure management?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 126th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 127th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Trinidad and Tobago: Swine — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/trinidad-and-tobago/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Trinidad and Tobago: Swine — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).