Ecuador vs Switzerland: Swine — Manure management

Ecuador
14.76 million kg
in 2023
Switzerland
15.11 million kg
in 2023
Ecuador rank
66th
Switzerland rank
64th

Swine — Manure management over time

  • Ecuador
  • Switzerland
10.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M50.0M60.0M196119922023

How they compare

Switzerland currently reports 15.11 million kg against 14.76 million kg in Ecuador, a difference of 351,400 kg.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 66th and Switzerland ranks 64th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 6 and Switzerland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Switzerland Difference Ahead
1960s 23.92 million kg 17.45 million kg 6.46 million kg Ecuador
1970s 37.90 million kg 22.69 million kg 15.21 million kg Ecuador
1980s 41.79 million kg 23.11 million kg 18.68 million kg Ecuador
1990s 37.14 million kg 17.95 million kg 19.19 million kg Ecuador
2000s 21.11 million kg 17.78 million kg 3.32 million kg Ecuador
2010s 20.93 million kg 16.97 million kg 3.97 million kg Ecuador
2020s 15.16 million kg 15.44 million kg 283,325 kg Switzerland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — manure management, Ecuador or Switzerland?
Switzerland, at 15.11 million kg against 14.76 million kg in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — manure management between Ecuador and Switzerland?
351,400 kg, with Switzerland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Switzerland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Switzerland rank globally for swine — manure management?
Ecuador ranks 66th and Switzerland ranks 64th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Switzerland: Swine — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/ecuador/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/ecuador/switzerland/">Ecuador vs Switzerland: Swine — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).