Equatorial Guinea vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Swine — Manure management

Equatorial Guinea
112,357 kg
in 2023
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
91,458 kg
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
154th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
157th

Swine — Manure management over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 112,357 kg against 91,458 kg in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 20,899 kg.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 154th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 157th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
1960s 53,761 kg 70,814 kg 17,053 kg Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1970s 63,763 kg 74,865 kg 11,102 kg Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1980s 69,464 kg 127,935 kg 58,471 kg Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1990s 81,766 kg 140,278 kg 58,512 kg Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2000s 92,718 kg 139,197 kg 46,479 kg Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2010s 102,505 kg 97,870 kg 4,634 kg Equatorial Guinea
2020s 110,823 kg 93,352 kg 17,471 kg Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — manure management, Equatorial Guinea or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Equatorial Guinea, at 112,357 kg against 91,458 kg in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — manure management between Equatorial Guinea and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
20,899 kg, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for swine — manure management?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 154th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 157th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Swine — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/equatorial-guinea/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/equatorial-guinea/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">Equatorial Guinea vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Swine — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).