Eswatini vs Puerto Rico: Swine — Manure management

Eswatini
697,788 kg
in 2023
Puerto Rico
623,478 kg
in 2023
Eswatini rank
118th
Puerto Rico rank
121st

Swine — Manure management over time

  • Eswatini
  • Puerto Rico
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M5.0M196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 697,788 kg against 623,478 kg in Puerto Rico, a difference of 74,310 kg.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Puerto Rico's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Eswatini ranks 118th and Puerto Rico ranks 121st of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Puerto Rico in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1960s 148,703 kg 2.57 million kg 2.42 million kg Puerto Rico
1970s 244,040 kg 3.61 million kg 3.36 million kg Puerto Rico
1980s 263,515 kg 3.11 million kg 2.85 million kg Puerto Rico
1990s 445,094 kg 2.73 million kg 2.28 million kg Puerto Rico
2000s 511,528 kg 1.04 million kg 531,025 kg Puerto Rico
2010s 570,296 kg 682,957 kg 112,662 kg Puerto Rico
2020s 712,614 kg 623,482 kg 89,133 kg Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — manure management, Eswatini or Puerto Rico?
Eswatini, at 697,788 kg against 623,478 kg in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — manure management between Eswatini and Puerto Rico?
74,310 kg, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Puerto Rico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Puerto Rico rank globally for swine — manure management?
Eswatini ranks 118th and Puerto Rico ranks 121st of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Puerto Rico: Swine — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/eswatini/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/eswatini/puerto-rico-us/">Eswatini vs Puerto Rico: Swine — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).