French Guiana vs Uzbekistan: Swine — Manure management
Swine — Manure management over time
- French Guiana
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
French Guiana currently reports 167,493 kg against 165,566 kg in Uzbekistan, a difference of 1,927 kg.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
French Guiana ranks 143rd and Uzbekistan ranks 145th of 172 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Guiana | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 149,542 kg | 1.23 million kg | 1.08 million kg | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 152,799 kg | 345,872 kg | 193,073 kg | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher swine — manure management, French Guiana or Uzbekistan?
- French Guiana, at 167,493 kg against 165,566 kg in Uzbekistan as of 2006.
- What is the difference in swine — manure management between French Guiana and Uzbekistan?
- 1,927 kg, with French Guiana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Guiana and Uzbekistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2006.
- How do French Guiana and Uzbekistan rank globally for swine — manure management?
- French Guiana ranks 143rd and Uzbekistan ranks 145th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).