Georgia vs Uruguay: Swine — Manure management
Swine — Manure management over time
- Georgia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 2.30 million kg against 2.25 million kg in Georgia, a difference of 42,010 kg.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 111th and Uruguay ranks 110th of 188 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.23 million kg | 4.28 million kg | 1.95 million kg | Georgia |
| 2000s | 5.55 million kg | 3.74 million kg | 1.80 million kg | Georgia |
| 2010s | 2.29 million kg | 2.95 million kg | 662,831 kg | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 2.34 million kg | 2.42 million kg | 77,642 kg | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher swine — manure management, Georgia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 2.30 million kg against 2.25 million kg in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in swine — manure management between Georgia and Uruguay?
- 42,010 kg, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Uruguay?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Uruguay rank globally for swine — manure management?
- Georgia ranks 111th and Uruguay ranks 110th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).