Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Swine — Manure management
Swine — Manure management over time
- Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) currently reports 753.06 million kg against 8.01 million kg in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 745.05 million kg.
That makes Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)'s figure about 94.0 times United Republic of Tanzania's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) has been ahead every year.
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 10th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 12th of 33 groups.
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 190.75 million kg | 1.54 million kg | 189.22 million kg | Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) |
| 1970s | 226.87 million kg | 2.03 million kg | 224.84 million kg | Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) |
| 1980s | 274.87 million kg | 3.49 million kg | 271.38 million kg | Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) |
| 1990s | 350.83 million kg | 5.43 million kg | 345.40 million kg | Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) |
| 2000s | 424.56 million kg | 7.00 million kg | 417.56 million kg | Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) |
| 2010s | 626.21 million kg | 7.63 million kg | 618.58 million kg | Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) |
| 2020s | 728.33 million kg | 7.96 million kg | 720.37 million kg | Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher swine — manure management, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) or United Republic of Tanzania?
- Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), at 753.06 million kg against 8.01 million kg in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in swine — manure management between Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 745.05 million kg, with Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for swine — manure management?
- Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 10th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 12th of 33 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).