North Macedonia vs Uruguay: Swine — Manure management
Swine — Manure management over time
- North Macedonia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 2.30 million kg against 2.21 million kg in North Macedonia, a difference of 88,210 kg.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
North Macedonia ranks 103rd and Uruguay ranks 100th of 172 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.07 million kg | 4.28 million kg | 2.21 million kg | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 2.26 million kg | 3.74 million kg | 1.48 million kg | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 2.09 million kg | 2.95 million kg | 867,618 kg | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 2.07 million kg | 2.42 million kg | 347,258 kg | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher swine — manure management, North Macedonia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 2.30 million kg against 2.21 million kg in North Macedonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in swine — manure management between North Macedonia and Uruguay?
- 88,210 kg, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Uruguay?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do North Macedonia and Uruguay rank globally for swine — manure management?
- North Macedonia ranks 103rd and Uruguay ranks 100th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).