Belize vs Ecuador: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita

Belize
0.0689 kg per person
in 2023
Ecuador
0.0692 kg per person
in 2023
Belize rank
89th
Ecuador rank
88th

Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita over time

  • Belize
  • Ecuador
0.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.0692 kg per person against 0.0689 kg per person in Belize, a difference of 0.0003 kg per person.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Belize ranks 89th and Ecuador ranks 88th of 149 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1703 kg per person 0.3777 kg per person 0.2074 kg per person Ecuador
1970s 0.1693 kg per person 0.45 kg per person 0.2807 kg per person Ecuador
1980s 0.1612 kg per person 0.3917 kg per person 0.2305 kg per person Ecuador
1990s 0.1511 kg per person 0.273 kg per person 0.1219 kg per person Ecuador
2000s 0.0892 kg per person 0.1299 kg per person 0.0407 kg per person Ecuador
2010s 0.0762 kg per person 0.1097 kg per person 0.0334 kg per person Ecuador
2020s 0.0698 kg per person 0.0719 kg per person 0.0022 kg per person Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita, Belize or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 0.0692 kg per person against 0.0689 kg per person in Belize as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita between Belize and Ecuador?
0.0003 kg per person, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Ecuador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Belize and Ecuador rank globally for swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita?
Belize ranks 89th and Ecuador ranks 88th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs Ecuador: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/belize/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/belize/ecuador/">Belize vs Ecuador: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita
Unit
kg per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.