Chile vs Guinea-Bissau: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita

Chile
0.181 kg per person
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau
0.1893 kg per person
in 2023
Chile rank
56th
Guinea-Bissau rank
54th

Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita over time

  • Chile
  • Guinea-Bissau
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.1893 kg per person against 0.181 kg per person in Chile, a difference of 0.0083 kg per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Chile ranks 56th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 54th of 149 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1375 kg per person 0.2547 kg per person 0.1171 kg per person Guinea-Bissau
1970s 0.1144 kg per person 0.2672 kg per person 0.1528 kg per person Guinea-Bissau
1980s 0.1175 kg per person 0.2759 kg per person 0.1584 kg per person Guinea-Bissau
1990s 0.1279 kg per person 0.2572 kg per person 0.1294 kg per person Guinea-Bissau
2000s 0.1891 kg per person 0.2018 kg per person 0.0126 kg per person Guinea-Bissau
2010s 0.1901 kg per person 0.227 kg per person 0.037 kg per person Guinea-Bissau
2020s 0.181 kg per person 0.1942 kg per person 0.0132 kg per person Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita, Chile or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 0.1893 kg per person against 0.181 kg per person in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita between Chile and Guinea-Bissau?
0.0083 kg per person, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Guinea-Bissau?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita?
Chile ranks 56th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 54th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Guinea-Bissau: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/chile/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/chile/guinea-bissau/">Chile vs Guinea-Bissau: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita
Unit
kg per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.