China vs Cuba: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita

China
0.2288 kg per person
in 2023
Cuba
0.1994 kg per person
in 2023
China rank
49th
Cuba rank
52nd

Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita over time

  • China
  • Cuba
0.10.150.20.250.3196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 0.2288 kg per person against 0.1994 kg per person in Cuba, a difference of 0.0294 kg per person.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

China ranks 49th and Cuba ranks 52nd of 149 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 6 and Cuba in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Cuba Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1453 kg per person 0.2352 kg per person 0.09 kg per person Cuba
1970s 0.2116 kg per person 0.196 kg per person 0.0156 kg per person China
1980s 0.2261 kg per person 0.2089 kg per person 0.0172 kg per person China
1990s 0.2447 kg per person 0.2087 kg per person 0.036 kg per person China
2000s 0.2462 kg per person 0.1877 kg per person 0.0586 kg per person China
2010s 0.2432 kg per person 0.2086 kg per person 0.0346 kg per person China
2020s 0.2295 kg per person 0.1537 kg per person 0.0758 kg per person China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita, China or Cuba?
China, at 0.2288 kg per person against 0.1994 kg per person in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita between China and Cuba?
0.0294 kg per person, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Cuba?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Cuba rank globally for swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita?
China ranks 49th and Cuba ranks 52nd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Cuba: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/china/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/china/cuba/">China vs Cuba: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita
Unit
kg per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.