Ecuador vs Singapore: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita

Ecuador
0.0692 kg per person
in 2023
Singapore
0.0723 kg per person
in 1990
Ecuador rank
88th
Singapore rank
85th

Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita over time

  • Ecuador
  • Singapore
0.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 0.0723 kg per person against 0.0692 kg per person in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0031 kg per person.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Singapore ahead.

Ecuador ranks 88th and Singapore ranks 85th of 149 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3777 kg per person 0.3654 kg per person 0.0124 kg per person Ecuador
1970s 0.45 kg per person 0.3706 kg per person 0.0794 kg per person Ecuador
1980s 0.3917 kg per person 0.1837 kg per person 0.208 kg per person Ecuador
1990s 0.2679 kg per person 0.0723 kg per person 0.1956 kg per person Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita, Ecuador or Singapore?
Singapore, at 0.0723 kg per person against 0.0692 kg per person in Ecuador as of 1990.
What is the difference in swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita between Ecuador and Singapore?
0.0031 kg per person, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Singapore?
30 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1990.
How do Ecuador and Singapore rank globally for swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita?
Ecuador ranks 88th and Singapore ranks 85th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Singapore: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/ecuador/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/ecuador/singapore/">Ecuador vs Singapore: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita
Unit
kg per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.