El Salvador vs Zambia: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita

El Salvador
0.0494 kg per person
in 2023
Zambia
0.051 kg per person
in 2023
El Salvador rank
102nd
Zambia rank
101st

Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita over time

  • El Salvador
  • Zambia
00.050.10.15196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.051 kg per person against 0.0494 kg per person in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0016 kg per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 102nd and Zambia ranks 101st of 149 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 5 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1582 kg per person 0.0192 kg per person 0.1389 kg per person El Salvador
1970s 0.1448 kg per person 0.0285 kg per person 0.1163 kg per person El Salvador
1980s 0.101 kg per person 0.0282 kg per person 0.0728 kg per person El Salvador
1990s 0.0555 kg per person 0.0313 kg per person 0.0242 kg per person El Salvador
2000s 0.0778 kg per person 0.0307 kg per person 0.0471 kg per person El Salvador
2010s 0.0586 kg per person 0.0602 kg per person 0.0016 kg per person Zambia
2020s 0.0497 kg per person 0.0523 kg per person 0.0026 kg per person Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita, El Salvador or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.051 kg per person against 0.0494 kg per person in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita between El Salvador and Zambia?
0.0016 kg per person, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Zambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Zambia rank globally for swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita?
El Salvador ranks 102nd and Zambia ranks 101st of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Zambia: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/el-salvador/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/el-salvador/zambia/">El Salvador vs Zambia: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita
Unit
kg per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.