Antigua and Barbuda vs Mexico: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square

Antigua and Barbuda
14.72 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico
12.7 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
60th
Mexico rank
63rd

Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Mexico
57.51012.515196119922023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 14.72 kg per square kilometre against 12.7 kg per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 2.02 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.2 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 60th and Mexico ranks 63rd of 149 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 3 and Mexico in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 7.87 kg per square kilometre 5.45 kg per square kilometre 2.41 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1970s 7.81 kg per square kilometre 8.46 kg per square kilometre 0.6471 kg per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 6.69 kg per square kilometre 11.55 kg per square kilometre 4.86 kg per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 8.42 kg per square kilometre 10.23 kg per square kilometre 1.82 kg per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 7.93 kg per square kilometre 9.87 kg per square kilometre 1.94 kg per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 14.34 kg per square kilometre 10.77 kg per square kilometre 3.58 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 14.58 kg per square kilometre 12.43 kg per square kilometre 2.15 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per square, Antigua and Barbuda or Mexico?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 14.72 kg per square kilometre against 12.7 kg per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per square between Antigua and Barbuda and Mexico?
2.02 kg per square kilometre, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Mexico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Mexico rank globally for swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per square?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 60th and Mexico ranks 63rd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Mexico: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/mexico/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Mexico: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.