Belarus vs Sao Tome and Principe: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square

Belarus
39.56 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
40.51 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
31st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
30th

Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square over time

  • Belarus
  • Sao Tome and Principe
020406080196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 40.51 kg per square kilometre against 39.56 kg per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0.95 kg per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 31st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 30th of 149 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 63.88 kg per square kilometre 1.81 kg per square kilometre 62.07 kg per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 55.38 kg per square kilometre 10.65 kg per square kilometre 44.73 kg per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 52.9 kg per square kilometre 31.07 kg per square kilometre 21.83 kg per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 41.17 kg per square kilometre 38.09 kg per square kilometre 3.07 kg per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per square, Belarus or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 40.51 kg per square kilometre against 39.56 kg per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per square between Belarus and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.95 kg per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sao Tome and Principe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per square?
Belarus ranks 31st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 30th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Sao Tome and Principe: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/belarus/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/belarus/sao-tome-and-principe/">Belarus vs Sao Tome and Principe: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.