Brazil vs Trinidad and Tobago: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square

Brazil
6.5 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
6.99 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
85th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
82nd

Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square over time

  • Brazil
  • Trinidad and Tobago
57.51012.515196119922023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 6.99 kg per square kilometre against 6.5 kg per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 0.49 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Brazil ranks 85th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 82nd of 149 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 4.19 kg per square kilometre 7.97 kg per square kilometre 3.77 kg per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 5.08 kg per square kilometre 11.46 kg per square kilometre 6.38 kg per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 4.93 kg per square kilometre 12.95 kg per square kilometre 8.02 kg per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 4.95 kg per square kilometre 8.65 kg per square kilometre 3.7 kg per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 5.16 kg per square kilometre 10.05 kg per square kilometre 4.89 kg per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 5.97 kg per square kilometre 7.57 kg per square kilometre 1.6 kg per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 6.47 kg per square kilometre 7.57 kg per square kilometre 1.1 kg per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per square, Brazil or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 6.99 kg per square kilometre against 6.5 kg per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per square between Brazil and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.49 kg per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per square?
Brazil ranks 85th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 82nd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Trinidad and Tobago: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/brazil/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/brazil/trinidad-and-tobago/">Brazil vs Trinidad and Tobago: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.